Let's Think Together
How do they know it was God speaking to them?
Published on July 19, 2007 By ThinkAloud In Religion
Recently an amazing theme started to appear in more than few of JU's postings. That is: God speaking with the authors of those postings, or so they claim. It seems that it is very fashionable nowadays to claim that what you say was according to what God told you during a "personal" speaking session with Him.

I honestly dont know what that means. In all God's messages to humanity, through His Messengers and Prophets, He said He chose those few people to convey His message to Humanity in general. He never said that He speaks to individual people privately to convey a personal message regarding those individuals and regarding them alone. The messages that were conveyed by those Messengers and Prophets were clear and specific and contain major, MAJOR, ideology and belief system. Essentially it was the Same Ideology and belief system with variations not very significant and it was intended to be delivered to all humanity not to be personal and specific to a certain individual.

so how do these people now claim that He, God, speaks to them? Messengers and Prophets of old always had what convinced people that they were REALLY getting what they say from God. They had certain qualities and capabilities no human can attain on his own. But these later-day- (i don’t even know what to call them now) have nothing meaningful to say except rehashing ideas and opinions shared and said by many other humans who never claimed that God talks to them.

GWB of course is the most famous Later-day-whatever. He said that Higher Authority told him to invade Iraq. As if this was something no one else thought of or desired before him. He forgot that his "Big Idea" was really old, as old as 1991 or even before and more sane people rejected it for its obvious dangers and wishful thinking.

Others do similar things. The prince of darkness (i.e. Robert D. Novak) recently claimed that he converted to Christianity after the HS told him so. Posts on JU are full of that kind of claims i.e. God or the HS is talking to people and told them what to do or say.

Again, how in the world do they know it was God? As far as I know God says if you want to talk to me, pray. If you want me to talk to you, read what I told my Messengers and Prophets to convey to you.

In other words unless someone claims that he/she is a prophet or a messenger he/she has no right whatsoever to say that God was talking to them. To claim otherwise is just simple arrogance and pretentious and they should really stop that. It is very silly and foolish. It shows and they just don’t see or feel it.

I just wanted to tell them all Stop it. Don’t use His name in vain to validate your brain's product (if that is where it is coming from).

Comments (Page 10)
11 PagesFirst 8 9 10 11 
on Aug 06, 2007
I never heard that word used in the sense you indicated. I took it to mean the usual meaning i.e. expressing regret on behalf of Muslims. and that is why i asked: why would Muslims need that?


I also found this in another dictionary:

Apologist:

n. defender of a doctrine, action, etc.

This word is well used in Christian circles TA. An apologist is someone who defends the faith.

We learn something new everyday...and that is a good thing.

on Aug 06, 2007
In the Christian book store there is a section on Apologetics, which means books that help you learn to defend your faith. I thought it meant what you thought it meant when I first went in there. I was thinking, "I know how to apologize... you say you're sorry. Duh."

So don't feel bad, but in Christian circles it is a commonly used word... you get used to it, then you use it in public, and people get confused!
on Aug 06, 2007
LULA POSTS:
My problem with the whole Islam/Qur'an thing is that in reality Arab Christians aren't now or ever have been given real freedom of conscience in any of the Muslim controlled

THINKALOUD POSTS: I dont know where did you get that information. It is TOTALLY false. You should take a trip to the middle east. Sometimes i am surprised that this Idea is still there. For how long we, here in the USA, will continue to be ill-informed about 1.5 billion of humans and what they do or dont do.

Some facts:

Egypt has 20% of population christians ...... many high-officials are christians including cabinet members and CEO's of major corp. Professionals have higher % christians than general population.

You will see the same thing in Syria, Lebanon (50%), Morocco, Tunisia, Iraq, Yemen, Algeria, Jordon, and Sudan.


To begin, let me be clear that I do not condemn nor ever have condemned all Muslims for the troubles that we experiencing today. I’ve only tried to show that it’s undeniably true that there is something really screwed up in the Muslim world about the way Islam is being received and the way the Qur’an is interpretated. I understand there are moderate Muslims, but where is moderate Islam to be found?


It’s no secret that radical Muslim jihadist’s main intention is to Islamify (impose Sharia) the entire world according to the teachings of the Qur’an. They don’t plan to accomplish this by way of peaceful conversion what I call faith and reason. History shows Muslim imperialism has been, for the most part, if not all, carried out by ‘the sword’. I’m hard pressed to believe they were all misunderstanding what the Qur’an says.

Today, we are facing an all-out push for Islamification of the West that cannot be denied...and Christians in at least 3 of the countries you cited, Iraq, Lebanon, and the Sudan, are fleeing by the droves for their lives and religious freedom.

I don’t have to go to the Middle East to know and understand what is happening over there...namely, that Christians are treated like seccond class citizens and persecuted in ways that violate their human dignity and freedom of conscience. News stories abound.

Here are some of the headlines:

Only a few weeks ago, 23 South Korean missionaries were kidnapped by Taliban rebels. Two have been killed; one was a Protestant pastor who was shot 10 times. The Pope is pleaing for their release. Where is the outcry and condemnation from the 1.5 billion ‘moderate’ Muslims whom you refer to above? Will murdering these “infidels’ be justified because they violated conditions of the Qur’an?

In April, 2005, British journalist Anthony Browne, a self described aitheist wrote in the UK’s Spectator, that roughly 300 million of the world’s Christians are persecuted or living under threat of violence becasue of their faith by Islamists. He writes, “Two years and many church attacks later, Iraq may still be occupied by Christian foreign powers, but the Islamist plan to ethnically cleanse Iraq of its nearly 2,000 year old Assyrian and Armenian Christian communities is reaching fruition.”
He goes on, ‘Christians are no longer thrown to the lions, but from China, North Korea, and Malaysia, through India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka to Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey they are subjected to legalized discriminations, violence, imprisonment, relocation and forced conversion.”

Feb. 2006, “Italian priest shot to death in Turkey allegedly by a Muslim teenager.”

Although they cry out that Islam is a religion of peace and harmony, Yousaf Mishaf, a 60 year old Pakastani Christian was arrested on June 28, 2005, for in Nowshera, on the grounds he desecrated the Qur’an under it’s blashemy laws, he could get the death penalty or life imprisonment.

Feb. 2006, Muslim extremists killed 6 Christians in cold blood in the own of Sulu Archipelago of the Phillipines. The attackers went door to door asked if the inhabitants were Muslim or Christian and those who said Christian were shot, the dead included a 9 month old girl.

A friend of mine wrote a letter to the Ambassodor of Turkey to express his disgust at the lack of relgious toleration by their government. He based his argument on the fact that there is total religious freedom for Muslims here in the US, and that Turkey’s government needed to reciprocate and restore full rights for the Greek Orthodox Chruch to celebrate Holy Mass.
on Aug 06, 2007
So don't feel bad, but in Christian circles it is a commonly used word... you get used to it, then you use it in public, and people get confused!


very true . I didnt feel bad, i realized that the word has two meanings. I just never heard it in that sense. as KFC said, we learn new things every day.
on Aug 06, 2007
It’s no secret that radical Muslim jihadist’s main intention is to Islamify (impose Sharia) the entire world according to the teachings of the Qur’an.


this is a great misconception and I wrote several times about that both in many comments and in separate article. And according to the teachings of Qura'an all they have to do is spread the word by mouth nothing else. It clearly say no islam by force. If you take what extremists say at face value, then take ALL what they say. I also wrote about that a long comment somewhere here on JU. They also say, leave our lands and leave us alone and we will not fight you. Noe either you believe all of what they say or you dont. but picking what you believe and what not to is not an honest way of making any judgement.

These extreme ideology is basically political and they use religion to get support from their ill-educated and ill-informed public. and that is why I also said many times we have to work on this weakness in the extremists' PR. we should work hard to convince these people that we are not against Islam as they think from what they hear from the extremists.

Your position is not helping, because you actually adopt the same position as the extremists. You say they want to convert us and they say to their people EXACTLY the same thing even though that is not the reason of their "Jihad". Both are wrong. no one is trying to convert anyone. it is someone trying to hold on something that is not his (us occupying their land) and the other trying to regain control of their own land.

Today, we are facing an all-out push for Islamification of the West that cannot be denied...and Christians in at least 3 of the countries you cited, Iraq, Lebanon, and the Sudan, are fleeing by the droves for their lives and religious freedom.


fleeing from those 3 countries applies to ALL religions there. Muslims in any of them are not in any better position than Jews or Christians. again, here you taking a political problem and presenting it as a religious one. It is not and it never was.

You can list ALL what the extremists/terrorists violence and it just proves one thing. There are terroists. That is not Muslims. can you take what the IRA did as actions of ALL Christians? the same thing Lola. The IRA terrorized the UK for more than 20 yrs, no muslim ever said that this is what christians do. And as we all know, not many in the west condemned the IRA either. most christians just didnt agree with what they did. that is very similar to the Muslim majority today. Almost like at a loss of what to do.

You know why? because the cause is Just, the methods are not. but whatever it is, it is clearly politics using religion to get the support of the masses. An old dirty method being used over and over again.

All level-headed people should realize that. Religion is a victim of extremists .... again. no wonder many young people dont even believe that there is a God or there is such a thing as Religion .... they dont believe in any of them.
on Aug 06, 2007
ThinkALoud,

Do you have a copy of the Qur'an? If you do, are there any Sura's that speak of or show love?
on Aug 06, 2007

I don’t have to go to the Middle East to know and understand what is happening over there...namely,


A friend of mine wrote a letter to the Ambassodor of Turkey to express his disgust at the lack of relgious toleration by their government.


That is why you need to go there. that toleration that you and I and everyone asks for is not there for ALL people there, ..... they are equal-opportunity dictators. Muslims and Jew have the same complaint. and that is not only in Turkey. That is the main political problem i referred to before. We support all these governments for reasons we all know.

Go live there for a while and you realize that it is the facts of life there. No religious discrimination and also no real political freedom except what serves to make it "look" like one. some of them dont even bother with that "look" thing.

on Aug 06, 2007
Do you have a copy of the Qur'an? If you do, are there any Sura's that speak of or show love?


Hi Lola. That is a funny question

Yes i do have a copy of Qura'an. I would not talk about it unless i read it. in its native language too. and yes there are many many verses which speak of and show love. All kinds of love. in a very decent and peotic way i might add. I will look these up for you. but as a start. Read Surah # 19. Guess what is its name: "Mariam .... i.e Mary" no less.

This Surah talks about Mary of course in a very lovely and compassionate way. Not only that it talks about most other prophets and messengers including Abraham, John the Baptist, Zakariya .. and many others . i will look other verses for you
on Aug 07, 2007
THINKALOUD POSTS # 110

Read Gen 18:16 to 19:29 .... it is clear that the angels went there and God blessed Lot and his family and saved them from destruction. God does not send His angels just to any body ....19:30 is a disgrace to a man who was the host of God's angels and Abraham's companion and God's messenger to that city that was destroyed. Read 19:9 these people objected to him coming to them and acting as a judge.



LULA POSTS: # 129

God didn't send His angels to Lot. He sent them to destroy the city. When the angels got there Lot was hospitable to them by inviting them into his house. Many interpretate this as the God rewarding Lot for his hospitality to the angels.



THINKALOUD POSTS: # 129
Let's look at your answer here:

First You say God didnt send his angels to Lot, HE sent them to destroy the city.

dont you see the problem here? you ignore the question completely and answer YOUR OWN Imagined one. I didnt ask WHY did God send them?

then you justify Lot's saving as a reward. based on what? someone's interpretation?

let's have some common sense here. why would angels need a host? why do they go to some's house and cause problem for him. the people attacked his house to get to these men for homosexual activities.



answering the wrong question, ignoring the text, and relying on others' interpretation doesnt lead to any truth. it just propagates the wrong understanding.


tHINKALOUD,
let's see if we can come to some understanding about Lot and come to some sort of an agreement that it's important when discussing Scripture to represent things properly.

Notice in reply # 110 that you said that "God does not send His angels [/B]just to any body ....19:30 is a disgrace to a man who was the host of God's angels"

In response to this I corrected you saying that God didn't send His angels to Lot per se, rather, that as per God's discussion with Abraham who interceded for Sodom, since ten just men were not found in Sodom, GOd sent the two angels to destroy it.

When the 2 angels arrived in Sodom, Lot was the first one they saw and he invited them into his house. That's the hospitality I was referring to and the same one I assume you were also referring to when you wrote in reply #110:

"God does not send His angels just to any body ....19:30 is a disgrace to [B]a man who was the host of God's angels"



Then you wrote, " let's have some common sense here. why would angels need a host? why do they go to some's house and cause problem for him. the people attacked his house to get to these men for homosexual activities.

The angels didn't cause problems for Lot, no not at all. You misunderstand the passages if you think that. The Angels forewarned Lot and his family to get out of there before they destroyed the city.

Yes, without a doubt, the sin of homosexuality was the chief cause of the destruction of the cities. Here we can see how hateful it is in the eyes of God and how severely He punishes it. Sexual impurity is an abominaton before God. It leads to many other sins and easily results in impenitence and impiety as was the case of the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrha. Almighty God doesn't always punish it in this world, but He will certainly do so in the next. "Do not err; neither fornicators, nor adulterers shall possess the kingdom of God." 1Cor.6:9.

Lot's steadfastness is worthy of our admiration. He lived for 20 years in the wicked city and did not let himself be led away in sin, but remained firm in what was right and brought up his children in the holy fear of God. Therefore, Holy Scripture in allusion to him, says, "The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly from temptation." 2Pet.2:9 becasue they pray and co-operate with grace.


on Aug 07, 2007
Yes i do have a copy of Qura'an. I would not talk about it unless i read it. in its native language too.


You read Arabic then?

I am presently looking into purchasing an English copy of the Qur'an. I want to make sure that I get a correct translation.
on Aug 07, 2007
thinkaloud posts:
there is a reason that there is a Text called Torah and another called Injil. that is not debatable and they are God's words. So what are the OT and NT which only existed 300-400 after Jesus was raised and they were a collection of many documents from many sources? Not only that. here is what the New RSV say in the preface:

"..... King James Version has serious defects..... which made it apparent that these defects were so many as to call for revision ....."


I agree the Torah is God's words becasue it's part of the Old Testament and was officially declared so by the Church.

You say the Ingil is too, but for me the jury is out on that. What specifically is the INgil and what books make it up? The INgil is a Muslim confection isn't it?

You are incorrect if you think the OT and NT only existed 3 or 4 hundred years after Jesus. The OT as we have it today existed at least 100 years before Christ (the Septuagint). All the writings of the NT were written within the first century after Christ and some believe the last one, St.John's Book of the APocalypse was written before 70 AD mainly becasue there is no specific reference to one of the most pivotal times in salvation history and that is the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple.

on Aug 07, 2007
You can get one free from many places online. Here's one. WWW Link


Thanks, LW.
on Aug 07, 2007
How wonderfully convenient that would be. "YOU had an INFLUENCE on ME - so it's your fault.

Did you mean to say quite that?{/quote]

No my statement is more one of cause and effect. The butterfly effect applies here.

We are not granted omniscience. We are forced to *think* to come up with our answers. My point is that whatever information, via a Bible or a Qu'ran or legends and myths or whatever is actually attributed to a deity, then the responsibility of the effect that that cause has on the thinking of an individual is the responsibility of the one that injected it for the sole fact that we are NOT perfect, and apparently everyone, including God, knows this. Apparently he knows ahead of time that we're going to screw it all up. Some of us are apparently alive for the sole purpose of screwing it up. And for serving our sole purpose, our reward is eternal punishment.

We're given "free will" apparently, and we retain that free will even after being influenced this way and that by differing information - none of which we truly have the wherewithal to determine is fact. And because we're supposedly imperfect, it's impossible to determine what the real truth is unless we all do one thing. Stop thinking. Completely. That is the only way to not be influenced by the information available.

I find this to be contradictory. We MUST think to decide the right thing, but we must NOT think in order to decide the right thing. Well which is it? This is what I call the stacked deck.

I'll put it another way...maybe one more tangible.

I pray about this all the time. Deeply. I really want to know what the right answer is so I can do right things. I'm a seeker, and I want nothing more than to serve the truth. Anyone that knows me will tell you this. And God has spoken loudly in my heart, and the answer is always the same. It's what I've just told everyone here and have told everyone in many other places. Now...where does that leave things? If you don't believe my claim is legitimate, then you must dispense with other claims as well (aka the Bible), for why should I not also be heard regarding what God has told my heart? Do I have to write it all in verses and chapters for it to be worthy? Maybe if I bury it in a mason jar and it gets digged up 1000 years from now, someone will listen? Will you listen now, or will you write me off as a crackpot? I claim divine inspiration through the humble solicitation of my soul for the answers to my questions. I received answers. Directly. Just like all those Bible fellows. But I already know what you'll think about this, because I was told that, too. I will be written off. I already have been, many times.

Apparently in revelations it says 'not to be deceived.' Well when Jesus does make his return appearance, who of you will believe him - or will you just kill him like always? You certainly don't mind writing off anyone that suggests you might have part of it wrong. You've got it all figured out already. Cool. Jesus better hope he doesn't disagree with your interpretations, or once again, he's a dead man.
on Aug 07, 2007
Ock, what does the divine inspiration tell you?
on Aug 07, 2007
Ock, what does the divine inspiration tell you?


I thought I'd explained this in spades, but ok.
2 It tells me that we are wasting our time trying to discern an absolute value to God.
3 That there isn't a right or wrong answer that we can determine through texts.
4 It tells me that doing the right thing is a part of consciousness,
5 and one does not need to subscribe to a theory of Creation in order to do the right thing.
6 It tells me that God doesn't care at all if I help out someone because I'm a Christian
7 or because I'm a Muslim
8 or because I'm a Buddhist
9 or because I'm just a nice guy.
10 That what is important is I was helpful.
11 It tells me the Bible,
12 and the Qu'ran,
13 and myths,
14 and legends,
15 and experiences related from the heart,
16 are all guides to understanding that being kind to our fellow human beings is more important than quoting the reasons why from said texts.
17 And, in accordance with Christian philosophy, I feel forgiven before I started.
18 That I was to be who I was,
19 and do the best I could,
20 and that was enough.
21 But I didn't feel this because I was Christian...I felt it because it made logical sense.
22 That divine purpose,
23 if there is one (which I am honest with myself about saying I am not sure),
24 includes what I do in an omniscient way.
25 That such a divine purpose would already know what I would add and what I would subtract from the world and would understand all of the whys involved in it.
26 And that I wouldn't be punished for my nature which was given me BY this same divine entity who already knew everything I was going to do anyway.
27 I was further told that no mistake was ever made. Everything is exactly how it should be.

11 PagesFirst 8 9 10 11